My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road North
>
820 Brown Road North
>
Land Use
>
78-317, SUBD
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2026 12:46:31 PM
Creation date
4/9/2026 12:33:45 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 27, 1978 - PAGE 16 <br />Pe stated the Zoning Administrator had advised him <br />to allow for the access along the lot line. The <br />Zoning Administrator informed the Commission he <br />had suggested that Mr. Adams request a 6 ft. <br />access strip to the lake which would be setback <br />from the lot line and excluded from the conserva- <br />tion easement over Lot 6. <br />Commissioner Hannah stated that when a dock is <br />put in it must be 10 ft. from each lot line. <br />Mr. Adams stated that for visual amenity reasons <br />they are trying to keep the structures to the corners <br />of the lots and they do not want the docks in <br />the middle of the property due to the wetlands <br />and also so they do not obstruct the views of <br />the new homes. <br />The Commission questioned if Lot 6 would have <br />riparian rights if there was a conservation <br />easement. <br />The Zoning Administrator referred the Commission <br />to a similar request by Cargill - Victoria Grain. <br />He informed the Commission the City Attorney had <br />advised him in that case the lot did have riparian <br />rights even though there was a conservation <br />easement across the lot. <br />Mr. Adams stated the owner of Lot 6 will have a <br />private easement to the other property so they <br />can go to the lake. He explained the shoreline <br />is very marshy and he did not think Orono was <br />loosing anything by allowing the private easement. <br />The configuration of the land and the fact they <br />are setting aside five acres for a conservation <br />easement is the hardship. He added that they have <br />a conservation easement and a separate pasture <br />easement. <br />Commissioner Hurr cited the request by Paul <br />Kaster who also asked for lake access for a back <br />lot and was denied. Another similar situation <br />was cited where a Mr. Dikstra requested the driveway <br />access easement be extended to provide lakeshore <br />access to the hack lot, but was denied. Commis- <br />sioner Hurr stated she understood providing <br />lake access would increase the value of the lots, <br />but felt providing the lake access for non- <br />lakeshore lots was against the philosophy of <br />the City of Orono. <br />TIM ADAMS <br />FARM AT LONG LAKE <br />#358 <br />(con 't) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.