My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3933
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3933
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 12:37:42 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:37:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> . .._ ._. . . . . . . . ..._--�..--._..:_.. . <br /> _ <br /> r <br /> O ..._._ .. . . <br /> � � _ <br /> , � O O ""' ' ... . <br /> � - .-�,- CITY of ORON� <br /> b' <br /> �(' � .'- '-.. <br /> '� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L�kESH�4�'� . - NO. � � `e3 `ci .. <br /> � 2. The properry is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential <br /> Zoning District where the minunum lot area requirement is two acres. � <br /> � 3. The Orono Planning Cominission reviewed this application on July 21, 1997 and <br /> recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variances based upon the <br /> following unique findings and hardships: <br /> A. The zoning lot does not meet the minimum requirements for the LR-lA <br /> � zoning district. . <br /> B. The existing structure is located in the 0-75' lakeshore setback and is <br /> considered non-conforming. <br /> � C. The roofline of the existing structure allows precipitation to accumulate <br /> • in the valley which has caused damage to the residence. <br /> D. The applicants aze unable to continue to insure the property unless the <br /> roofline is corrected. <br /> E. Previous variances have been granted for this property (Resolutions #39, <br /> � #185 and #1698). <br /> 4. T'he City Council finds that the conditions existing on this properly are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning.district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traf�c conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> � serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> . intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> � 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, cominents � � <br /> � by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety� <br /> and welfare of the community. <br /> � Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.