Laserfiche WebLink
JUL 21 2003 4:11 PM FR HINSHAW & CULBERTSON334 8888 TO 4707"754868"9522 P.02 <br />HINSHAW & CULBERTSON <br />D5LUWILLE. ILLINOIS <br />CHAMPA.ION, ILUNOIS <br />CtllCAGO, ILLl?'IOIS <br />CP.YS'l'AL Lt\Kll. lLLINOIS <br />JOtlliT, ILLTNOIS <br />LISLE. ILLIJIIOIS <br />PEOR.IA.11..LINOIS <br />ROCKFORD, ILI.TNOIS <br />SPRJNOl'IELD, ILl.11'1O15 <br />W/1.IJKEOAl'l. ILLIJIIOIS <br />PH0£NllC. ARIZONA <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />222 South Nintl1 Street <br />Suite: 3100 <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota S5402 <br />612-333-3434 <br />Facsimile 612-334-8888 <br />www.hinshawculbertson.com <br />T8arrett@hinshawlaw.com <br />July 21, 2003 <br />Via Facsimile (952-545-1793) and U.S. Mail <br />Richard J. Schieffer <br />5881 Cedar Lake Road <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 <br />Re: Charles E. Van Eeckhout, et al. v. Mary Ann Dunn, et alia, <br />Fourth Judicial District Case Number TQ31531 <br />Dear Mr. Schieffer: <br />I.OS ANOELB5, CALll'ORNIA <br />S/1.N FRANCISCO, CALlFOltNIA <br />FT. LAUDl!llDAl.!. FLONl:IA <br />IACKSONVtLLE, 'Ft.OIUDA <br />MIAMI, fLOlUDA <br />TAMPA, fLOR!DA <br />SCHER!IWJLLS, INDIANA <br />MINN!ZAPOLIS, MINNtiSOIA <br />NEW VORK, NBW YOR!C <br />ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI <br />APl't.iTON, WISCONSIN <br />l\lllLWA\TKEB, WISCONS!N <br />This letter will serve, as we agreed, as a motion to quash the subpoena which was served <br />on Michael Gaffron, Director of Planning for the City of Orono. The motion is made pursuant to <br />Rule 45.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure. It will be presented to the Special Master <br />who presides at this hearing on the morning of the hearing. <br />The subpoena duces tecum, attached to this letter motion, requires Mr. Gaffron to attend <br />a hearing on July 23, 2003 and commands him to produce the following items, records or <br />documents: <br />Records or files containing examples of private driveways serving three or more <br />building sites or dwelling units in which the City of Orono did not obtain an <br />easement for road purposes. No more than 10 examples need be provided. <br />As we discussed, the City will move to quash this subpoena at the hearing on this matter <br />set at 9:00 a.m. in Room A-702 of the Hennepin County Government Center. <br />The bases upon which this subpoena should be quashed are the following: <br />1. The subpoena is untimely. Mr. Gaffron is now in the middle of the City's <br />summer construction process 1 his office is short two planners, and he is effectively doing the <br />work of three people. The subpoena duces te~um was served in the morning of July 21, 2003, <br />12 I071G68v\ 0J6