Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />February 26, 2001 <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*(#4) #2450 GLENN AND SANDRA GRONBERG, 325 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH - <br />EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL-RESOLUTION NO. 4610 <br />Sansevere moved, White seconded, to approve and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4610, <br />a Resolution Granting an Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval for a Plat Proposed at <br />325 Willow Drive North. VOTE: Ayes 5 , Nays 0. <br />(#-s) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH- <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT-DENIAL RESOLUTION NO. 4611 <br />Charles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present. <br />Weinberger stated the primary unresolved issue with this application is access to the property. <br />Weinberger indicated the review period expires at the end of the month and will need to be <br />extended if the Applicant intends to pursue this application. Weinberger stated he has a letter <br />available tonight for the Applicant's signature extending the time period. <br />Weinberger stated a resolution denying preliminary plat is before the City Council tonight. <br />Van Eeckhout stated he has not made any new progress on securing access to this development. <br />The Planning Commission indicated at their last meeting they did not wish to discuss this <br />application any further . Van Eeckhout stated he has spoken with the Long Lake Planning · <br />Commission who indicated in their view there is not a positive response by the residents on that <br />street to have access off of Apple Glen Road due to the added traffic that would result. Van <br />Eeckhout commented Apple Glen is a public road and in his view he has a legal right to have <br />access off of Apple Glen if he so desires sin ce other people in the past have been granted access <br />off of this road. <br />Van Eeckhout stated in his opinion a denial resolution is not the best way to handle this matter <br />and other options should be explored. Van Eeckhout stated in his view the time limit is a n9n- <br />issue since there was one occasion in the past where the time limit expired. <br />Van Eeckhout stated the application before the Council tonight proposes to construct seven lots <br />with access off Apple Glen Road. Van Eeckhout stated the only reason for denial contained in <br />the resolution is the lack of access , and in his opinion he is legally erititled to this access jf he · <br />wishes to pursue it. Van Eeckhout stated the City in essence is telling him that he is not entitled <br />to access off Apple Glen , which is inconsistent in his view . Van Eeckhout noted he would prefer <br />access to be off of Brown Road, but was told on December 11 th by the City that they would <br />accept access off of Apple Glen, which was later rescinded at their January meeting . Van <br />Eeckhout stated that decision by the City hurt his negotiations with John Dunn on securing access <br />into this development. <br />Sansevere stated he does not agree with Van Eeckhout's statement. <br />Mayor Peterson indicated she also does not agree with that version . <br />PAGES <br />/ <br />J'