Laserfiche WebLink
#04-2998 <br />March 12, 2004 <br />Page3 <br />The PRD process allows the property owner to submit land subdivision plans for any "R" District without <br />adherence to minimum lot size requirements for each building lot, provided that the total number ofbuilding <br />lots, or dwelling units, shall not exceed the number of such lots or units permissible under the minimum lot <br />size requirements of the zoning district. <br />The dwelling units permitted may be, at the discretion of the Council and subject to the conditions set forth <br />by the Council, in detached, attached or multiple family dwelling structures; subject to the limitations <br />provided for in each zoning district. <br />The dedication, ownership, use and maintenance of open spaces created by the application of the Planned <br />Residential Development shall be subject to conditions deemed necessary by the Council to assure the <br />preservation of such open spaces for their intended purposes, such as easements or other forms of <br />dedication, covenants, etc. <br />The City Council has broad discretion as to whether a property will be allowed to subdivide using the PRD <br />process. The PRD should be considered when unique land configuration or natural amenities can be best <br />protected and preserved by relaxing the lot subdivision regulations. <br />The nature of this property is such that a relatively small portion of the 20-acre total is suitable for actual <br />construction, due to the existence of wetlands, drainage ways, the creek, and steep slopes. The property <br />is a candidate for development as a PRD, in staff's opinion. <br />4. Site Layout and Lot Standards <br />A few general and some specific comments are offered here regrading the various concept plans: <br />1. Each of the five plans show a lot along the Luce Line, requiring a creek crossing and yielding a very <br />narrow and limited (but perhaps highly attractive) building site very near the Luce Line Trail. This <br />lot in each case is served by a driveway within a narrow corridor between or adjacent to other lots, <br />making it by definition a back lot. It is not clear whether the area calculations yield 2 acres of dry <br />buildable land. <br />Staff would suggest that the setback along the Luce line must be considered as a rear lot line for <br />this property and subject to a 50' setback, not 30' as shown. This leaves a buildable area of about <br />7500 s.f., mostly situated on a steep slope (perhaps bluff, perhaps not) overlooking the creek. <br />Staff would strongly recommend that this lot not be created as a building site, and that it be <br />preserved either as parkland adjacent to the Luce Line or via some other restrictions. Staff would <br />suggest that preservation of this area of the property and avoiding any vehicular creek crossing to <br />access it, should be a primary goal of the City in allowing development of this property.