Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page2 <br />December 8, 2000 <br />#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout <br />4 Lots vs. 7 Lots <br />The revised plan does not entirely resolve the access issue. Throughout the process it was the intent of the <br />applicant and City to have access for all lots out to Brown Road. However Mr. Van Eeckhout has an <br />easement for "driveway" purposes over an adjacent property, not for road use. The City Attorney has <br />determined the easement to the subject property(ies) could not be used for road purposes. Therefore, access <br />to Apple Glen is required. <br />The City of Orono permits only 2 lots to be served by a driveway. More than 2 lots would require a road. <br />One other lot shares the access corridor to Mr. Van Eeckhout' s property. That property is located adjacent <br />to Brown Road. A total of3 lots would be utilizing the corridor. The City of Orono has approved this access <br />arrangement elsewhere when findings were made to justify not building a road. <br />Council Action Requested <br />Motion to refer the revised proposal to the Planning Commission for review of a 4 lot plan with 2 having <br />access to Brown Road South and 2 with access to Apple Glen Road, subject to review by Long Lake.