Laserfiche WebLink
#03-2998 <br />March 12, 2004 <br />Page6 <br />11. Conformity with Shoreland Regulations <br />The setback to the creek bank for Long Lake Creek for this sewered property is 7 5' Wetland setbacks <br />of26' must be adhered to. The MCWD may require greater setbacks for this wetland. <br />12. Wetlands On Site and/or Impacted <br />The wetlands on the property were delineated a few years ago to help determine the amount of dry <br />buildable area. The City will require aFlowage and Conservation Easement over all wetlands designated <br />on the site. The applicant is advised to avoid any impacts to wetlands which can be avoided by proper site <br />layout. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is the City's LGU for administration of the <br />Wetland Conservation Act rules. <br />13. Tree and/or Woodland Impacts <br />The site is heavily wooded with a variety of tree species. Orono does not have a tree preservation <br />ordinance other than within the 0-75' lakeshore and creek setback zone, where clearcutting and removal <br />of trees 6" or greater in diameter is prohibited. The developer may be required to provide boulevard trees <br />along the private road at appropriate locations. The developer is encouraged to preserve as many trees <br />as possible to retain the wooded character of the property. <br />13. Archaeological Site Proximity or Study Needed <br />Given the unique nature of the site in its proximity to Long Lake Creek, the developer is advised to contact <br />the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to determine whether an archaeological study is warranted. <br />14. Potential Bluff Impacts <br />While there are steep slopes on the site, none appear to meet the criteria to be considered as bluffs; <br />however, staff has not done a detailed analysis, which should be completed before any conclusions are <br />reached. <br />Summary <br />The goal of this review is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent City ordinances and <br />how they affect the proposed plat, and to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each of the various <br />proposals. The above comments reveal a number of issues for subdividing this property, and also suggest <br />some opportunities for preservation of unique amenities associated with the site. <br />During the sketch plan review, the developer should advise whether any of the issues noted present <br />particular problems, so that those issues can be discussed and the potential for approval or denial of <br />variances to code standards can be addressed by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission should <br />review each topic and identify any issues to which the developer should pay special attention.