Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of ORONO <br />~ <br />~ t ~< -§>v RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />"~/(El~ <br />---= <br />4 IQ 1·1 ·1 NO. V . , <br />District, and Board of Water and Soil Resources met on the property to review <br />the wetland boundary as delineated by Svobota Ecological Services (SES). <br />3. The TEP generally agreed to the delineation line as determined by SES. <br />4. The City of Orono has established an inventory of protected wetlands that are <br />not considered buildable and valuable natural resources. Those areas shown on <br />the 197 4 wetland inventory are not credited towards buildable area for zoning <br />purposes. A total of approximately 14 acres of the 20 ± land area is considered <br />above the wetland boundary, based on the TEPs wetland review. <br />5. Access to the property has been proposed via a platted corridor through Tract <br />G, R.L.S. No. 352. <br />6. Since 1954 Tract H has an easement over Tract G for driveway purposes. It is <br />the City of Orono's position the easement is granted for driveway purposes, not <br />roadway purposes. Prior to approving a subdivision, using Tract G for road <br />access, the City must receive sufficient evidence that the owners of Tract G <br />consent to the plat or an easement for road purposes be acquired in favor of <br />Tract H. <br />7. The applicant has stated he has been unable to successfully negociate an <br />easement for road purposes with the owner of Tract G. <br />8. A revised site plan was received by the City of Orono in July, 2000 that would <br />require access from Apple Glen Road in the City of Long Lake. The City of <br />Orono has made a request to the City of Long Lake to comment and determine <br />what right of access Long Lake would permit. <br />9. The applicant has not received approval for access to Apple Glen Road from the <br />City of Long Lake. <br />10. The Council has determined the preferred option for access is via Tract G. <br />Access through Apple Glen Road would have required the road be extended, <br />additional traffic for additional residences and formal approval from the City of <br />Long Lake had not been granted. <br />Page 2 of 4