Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, March 18, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />happened in 1994, with the plat of Blue Hill. The basis for the approval of the lot area variance to allow <br />one lot <br />(#02-2763 Clayt and Julie Tabor, Continued) <br />less than two acres in size dated back to a 1980 Council resolution which was adopted during the <br />process of assigning sewer units to the Minnetonka Bluffs sewer project. The Council approved one lot <br />to be less than two acres based on the "agreement" that had been made by the 1980 resolution between <br />the City and the property owner. <br />Weinberger indicated based on the number of subdivisions that have been approved in the City of <br />Orono, it would be precedent setting to approve this proposed subdivision. The subject property has <br />been guided for two acre rural residential development by the 2000-2020 Comprehensive Plan. The <br />property has been zoned two acre since at least 1967. This property has also been recently included in <br />MUSA, but the provision of sewer to the property does not change the rural character for this district. <br />Weinberger noted the Applicants have submitted a petition signed by a number of surrounding property <br />owners in agreement with this particular plan. Weinberger stated Staff did receive one call from a <br />neighbor who had some concerns regarding a possible townhome development on this property. <br />Tabor indicated the country club addition that surrounds their property consists of 22 properties, with 21 <br />of those properties being less than one acre. Tabor stated in his view this subdivision will help increase <br />the housing value in the neighborhood and will give them the financial ability to renovate their existing <br />residence. Tabor stated if the property were subdivided, the two lots would still exceed the size of the <br />majority of the other properties within the area and will not detract from the rural character of the <br />neighborhood. <br />Mrs. Tabor commented they would like to stay in the community and remodel their existing residence, <br />which this subdivision would allow them to do. <br />Mabusth inquired whether the Applicants had petitioned for sewer. <br />Mr. Tabor stated they had not, noting their current septic system works fine. <br />Mabusth inquired why rural sized properties were included in the MUSA. <br />Gaffron stated the MUSA boundary that was adopted with the new Comprehensive Plan incorporates <br />everything south of County Road 6 from Lake Klassen all the way to Spring Hill Road. Gaffron stated <br />this area consists of a significant number of shoreland properties and are also adjacent to the sewer <br />main. Gaffron stated this area is not currently sewered by City sewer. <br />Hawn indicated the Planning Commission is bound by the City Code, noting this application does not <br />comply with those documents. Hawn stated the Planning Commission is a recommending body and <br />recommended the Applicants pursue this matter with the Council. Hawn stated in her view without <br />input from the Council she would not be able to support this subdivision. <br />Mabusth stated she would agree with Hawn, noting she does not feel the Council would be in support of <br />this type of lot di vision. <br />(Council Member Jim White arrives at 8:46 p.m.) <br />PAGE 17