My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road North
>
925 Brown Road North - 27-118-23-34-0001
>
Land Use
>
16-3812, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2026 1:16:44 PM
Creation date
4/2/2026 1:15:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 21, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /><__'v <br />Gaffron indicated it would be considered lakeshore . Gaffron indicated the reason it becomes a lakeshore <br />lot is because the lot continues into the lake and that the survey confirms that. <br />Lemke asked if the lakeshore is determined by a certain elevation. <br />Gaffron stated it is. Back in 1992, the City adopted the Shore land Ordinance at the request of the DNR in <br />order to establish an OHWL. This property is one that did not have that elevation so the City went <br />through a process to define the elevation of the OHWL based on historical records and trees , etc . Gaffron <br />noted that elevation has been established for more than 20 years and that there is no question from a legal <br />perspective that this is a lakeshore lot. <br />Greg Reitan, Applicant, stated the purpose of the variance is to allow them to remodel the existing house. <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. <br />Tom Lane, 915 North Brown Road, stated it does not appear this addition will impact his sightlines down <br />to the lake and that it should be an enhancement to the neighborhood. <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. <br />Leskinen stated the request is completely reasonable. Leskinen noted if the Brown farm were ever <br />rebuilt, it would need to be pushed back to meet the 50-foot street setback and that defining the lakeshore <br />setback by a home that is nonconforming seems unreasonable . <br />Thiesse asked if the existing trees will be removed. <br />Reitan indicated one maple tree will likely need to be removed. <br />Thiesse moved, Olson seconded, to recommend approv al of Application No. 16-3812, Greg Reitan <br />and Sally Neubauer, 925 Brown Road North, granting of an average lakeshore setback v ariance. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Page 9 of 31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.