My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3926
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 12:34:04 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:34:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. .�t�, <br /> ' � O� <br /> • O O <br /> ��b. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � ti � <br /> '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> '� G <br /> � ��kESH�g'� ^� Na �� 9 2 g <br /> 2. The properiy is located in the LR 1B Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District where the minimum lot area requirement is one acre. . <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 16, 1997 and <br /> recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variances and conditional use <br /> permit based upon the following unique findings and hardships: <br /> a. The zoning lot does not meet minimum lot area, lot width or side yard <br /> requirements. <br /> b. The existing structure conforms to the average lakeshore setback but does <br /> not meet the 75' lakeshore setback. <br /> . . c. The topography of the zoning lot is within the floodplain in the middle of <br /> • � � the zoning lot. <br /> d. The Zoning Code allows 15% lot coverage. <br /> e. The existing hardcover in the 0-75' setback is 609.25 sq. ft. (9%). <br /> 4. The Council fmds that the conditions e�sting on this property are peculiar to it and <br /> do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or diff'iculty; is necessary to preserve a substantial properry right of the applicants; <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> � Comprehensive Plan of the City. � . � <br /> 5. �'he City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow land. <br /> alteration in the 0-75' setback and floodplain will not be detrimental to the health, <br /> safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properry, nor will its use <br /> depreciate sunounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the <br /> properry will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and <br /> • Com�rehensive Plan of the Ciry. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.