Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1981 Page 4 <br />Applicant stated that he would r,-move approximately 6-9 LE DSTROM (CONT.) <br />inches, or just until the ori,lin. �., ttom was restored. <br />Hammerel moved to approve the cunditi..•al use permit for <br />maintenance dredging of Richard Ledstrom's wildlife pond <br />subject to the following findings and conditions: <br />1 - The pond is of -en water and is not supporting any <br />wetland vegetation therefore dredging would not <br />remove any existing assimilative capacity. <br />2 - with removal of the culvert, there is no direct <br />flowage from the pond into the adjacent wetlands. <br />3 - The proposal would not increase pond size nor <br />reduce retention capacity. <br />4 - Application is "maintenance dredging". <br />Adams seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), 'Nays (0). <br />Applicants were not present. The Lundquists are the new JOAN LUNDQUIST <br />owners of the Mexican Inn in Navarre. The Mexican Inn was 3416 Shoreline Dr. <br />never recognized with a formal conditional use permit and Conditional [Ise <br />staff has asked the owner to apply for the required permit. Permit <br />Planning Commission found no problems. 0650 <br />Jabbour moved to approve the conditional use permit for <br />Joan Lundquist, owner of the Mexican Inn. <br />Hammerel seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Lachlan Reed and Dick Hassel, applicants attorney, were <br />present. Jabbour stated that he was surprised that the City <br />would accept an application that allowed expansion of a <br />non conforming structure in consideration of the Orono <br />Code and the recent State Supreme Court ruling. <br />Mabusth advised Jabbour to consult Section 31.110 distin- <br />guishing the differences in interpreting code for non- <br />conforming uses and non -conforming structures. <br />Dick Hassel explained that of the total 3.59 acres 1.93 is <br />excluded from the building envelope. He noted for the <br />Planning Commission that the actual increase in hardcover <br />was 56 sf because of the existing hardcover the addition <br />would be placed on. <br />Rovegno suggested a trade off of hardcover to allow for <br />the additional hardco�,er. fie questioned the existing <br />drainage or manhole in the west corner of the paved area. <br />Hassel stated that he could not conceive of a Nore accep- <br />table method of drainage since the existing trade brings <br />all of the drainage on the west side to that manhole and to <br />have it opened up and drain over the banks would create <br />extreme erosion problems which is not environmentally sound. <br />�/LACHLAN REED <br />1499 Brackett_'s <br />Point ?toad <br />Variance <br />#651 <br />