My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3903
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 12:22:41 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:22:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
\ • <br /> , ` � \� . <br /> ' � O� <br /> O O <br /> � ��b. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � ' ti . . <br /> '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L�kE H�g'�G � NO. :� � 0 3 � <br /> � S <br /> � FINDINGS , <br /> , <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2221. � . � <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District where the minimum lot area requirement is one acre. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 19, 1997 and <br /> � recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following <br /> � unique findings and hazdships: <br /> . A. The property does not meet the minimum requirements for lot area, lot <br /> width and side yards in the LR-1C Zoning District. <br /> B. The current residence is unoccupied and deemed uninhabitable by the <br /> • property owner. <br /> C. The entire site, with exception of a small area in the northeast corner, is <br /> located in the 0-75' setback from the lagoon and Lake Minnetonka. <br /> � D. The lot does not meet average lakeshore or lakeshore setbacks; the <br /> proposed residence will conform more closely to the setbacks. <br /> E. The proposed residence reduces the total amount of hardcover. <br /> 4. The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that � <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or o.ther danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve •a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> � . intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. . <br /> • Page 2 of 5 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.