My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3902
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 12:22:27 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:22:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� °� � � . <br /> �; o � o <br /> ��b. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � � ti . <br /> '� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � ���kE H�4��'G NO. � � C) � � , <br /> � S . . <br /> Zoning District and partially within the RR-1B-1 Single Family Rural Residential <br /> Subdistrict. <br /> . 3. Within the RR-1B and RR 1B-1 zoning districts,golf courses are a permitted use via <br /> conditional use permit, subject to the principal structure being located 100 feet or <br /> more from any abutting lot in an'R'District,and subject to accessory slructures being <br /> a minimum of 50'from any lot line. The proposed golf course meets these minimum <br /> requirements. <br /> 4. The Orono Pla.mvng Commission reviewed the proposed variances and conditional <br /> use permits on February 18, 1997, March 17,�1997, Mazch 31, 1997, and Apri121, <br /> 1997; and on April 21, 1997 recommended approval of the variances and CUP by a <br /> vote of 6-0. � <br /> • 5. The proposed golf course was subject to a mandatory Environmental Assessment . <br /> Worksheet(EAVi�review process as stipulated by State law,to determine whether <br /> an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)would be required for the project. The City <br /> Council on May 21, 1997 declared via Resolution No. 3901 that no EIS would be <br /> required. � • <br /> 6. The EAW review process resulted in comments and recommendations regarding <br /> course design,course operation, and mitigation of environmental impacts,many of <br /> which have been incorporated into the Conditions of this resolution. � <br /> 7. Approval of the requested variance for conshuction of an oversize accessory structure <br /> is justified by the following hardships and unusual conditions: <br /> � � A. The equipment and supplies for maintenance of a 200-acre golf course � <br /> require a space significantly in excess of the 3,000 s.f. footprint <br /> structure that would normally be allowed on a residential property in <br /> the RR-1B or RR-1B-1 zone. <br /> B. The proposed golf course is not a residential use,and the zoning code . <br /> limitations on accessory building size were intended to apply mainly <br /> to the 2-acre single family lot development typical of the RR-1B and <br /> • <br /> Page 2 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.