My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Brown Road North
>
650 Brown Road North - 34-118-23-12-0004
>
Land Use
>
99-2504, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2026 1:43:23 PM
Creation date
3/26/2026 1:42:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM: Kris Jenson, Assistant Zoning Administrator/Planner <br />DATE: July 7, 1999 <br />SUBJECT: #2504 -Warren & Tana Garrett, 650 Brown Road North <br />Variance Request <br />Zoning District: LR-IA <br />-- <br />Application: The applicant proposes to install a 3 rail , split-rail fence, 5' in height, along <br />the south property line to the lakeshore as well as a home addition, a deck <br />addition and an inground swimming pool with decking around the pool, all <br />located between the house and the lake. <br />STAFF SUMMARY <br />First, the applicants are planning an addition to the Northeast comer of the home. The <br />addition is 12' x 20' and will line up with the existing North wall of the home and the existing East <br />side of the deck. <br />Second, the applicants are proposing a deck addition and inground swimming pool. The total <br />surface area of the additions , along with the ex isting hardcover in the 250'-500' will not exceed 30%. <br />The proposed deck addition will be added to the southeast comer of the existing deck, with the <br />inground pool located approximately 30' east of the existing deck. The variance required for these <br />items is the average lakeshore setback. Since the applicant's home is located closer to the lake than <br />either of its neighbors, the average lakeshore setback is their existing home, or approximately 3 85'. <br />Along the north and south property lines are mature stands of trees that buffer the view to either <br />property owners to the north and south. Staff feels that the proposed location is the most logical , <br />and it will not block or interfere with the view of either neighbor towards the lake. <br />Finally, the applicants are proposing a 3-rail, split rail fence , no more than 5' in height, to run <br />along the south property line, from the driveway to the lakeshore , approximately 790' in length. The <br />applicants want a fence due to the fact that the neighboring lakeshore owner to the south is a Long <br />Lake City Park, and the appl icant's have had people trespass on their property and dock. The <br />applicant's feel that the proposed fence will be high enough to deter trespassers , but will not block <br />the view of the townhome owners. The President of the West Shore Townhome Association has <br />written a letter to the City protesting any fence being erected on the applicant's property. A copy <br />of the letter is included in the exhibits. <br />#2 504 War ren & Ta na Garrett <br />650 Brown Road North <br />J uly 7, 1999 <br />Page 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.