Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 12, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />#15-3774 MICHAEL STEADMAN ON BEHALF OF IRWIN JACOBS, 1700 <br />RELINE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT (continued) <br />Gaffron st once preliminary plat approval is approved, it is essentiall}'.Jh~itment to a <br />plan. Gaftron s d whether there is a cul-de-sac or not is a sigaj oo1itelement of the development. <br />Steadman asked if the dela <br />Gaftron stated it would probably be ut ~ out, which would give a ~hance for the developer to <br />examine whe~er that works. Gaffro .stfiledjt w~uld make sense t.o explore it for a couple of weeks, <br />come back with some plans, and en do a prehm nary plat resolution. <br />Steadman indicat~ ould be open to that. <br />Levang with ~ her motion. <br />Levang ved, Printup seconded, to table Application No. 15-3774, Micli Steadman on behalf of <br />I · acobs, 1700 Shoreline Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0 <br />*10. #15-3775 JEFF ZITZLOFF, 1380 BRIAR STREET, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. <br />6550 <br />Printup moved, Walsh seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6550 , a Resolution Granting Lot <br />Area, Lot Width and Setback Variances from Orono Municipal Code Sections 78-420, for the <br />property located at 1380 Briar Street. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays O. <br />"'-*11. #15-3778 TODD BALAN, 2905 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCE -RESOL <br />N . 65S1 <br />Printup oved, Walsh seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 65S1, ~solution Granting <br />Variances m Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1288, 78-168 (and 78-1700, for the property <br />located at 290 asco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. <br />12. #15-3779, T -ITY CHURCH, 2060 SIXT A VENUE NORTH, CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT AND VARIAN E-RESOL~ 6552 <br />Gaffron stated the Trinity Luther Ch :eli is proposing to redo their existing monument sign which is <br />located quite a ways off the road. hurch is proposing to install a new electronic reader board. <br />Gaftron indicated the Pl ·. g Commission waa,___fine with the proposal but suggested a condition be <br />imposed that the interyat etween message chang~,b_,e at least eight seconds so drivers will not be <br />distracted by the chahge in message. Gaffron noted the · is an approximate 6-second interval for drivers <br />to pass the si .~m the time it is first visible. <br />Gaffro noted a question was asked earlier about what the City did · the school's reader board. <br />Ga on stated that sign was approved back in 2005 and no condition was ced on how often the <br />message could be changed in the resolution. <br />Page 21 of 37