Laserfiche WebLink
FILE# 15-3746 <br />9 June 2015 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />sized home on the property. The new home will be set at a similar setback from the road as <br />existing allowing for an open front yard area. The proposed setback of 31.5 feet from the rear <br />for the garage portion of the home still affords adequate open space between the proposed <br />home and the neighboring home to the east. <br />Pertinent Authority <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances <br />unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only <br />when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. <br />Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in <br />Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council <br />may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the <br />zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance <br />the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. <br />5. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. <br />6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. <br />7. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. <br />8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, <br />and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application.