My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4029
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4000 - 4099 (November 10, 1997 - June 22, 1998)
>
Resolution 4029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 12:08:30 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:08:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,r�-�:Y:. .��i�y..r <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> r �b. - CITY of ORONO <br /> � � � <br /> ti <br /> ��� ��'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � 9kESH�g' NO. <br /> ,� � <br /> A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br /> A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE �� <br /> � SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3(1Vn � <br /> FILE NO. 2289 <br /> WI�REAS, Jon M. Pendleton (hereinafter the "applicant") is the owner of the <br /> property located at 350 North Arm Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and <br /> legally described as: � <br />• Lot 2, Block, 1, Markoe Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter <br /> "property"); and � <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a conditional use permit <br /> to permit the seasonal keeping of a horse on his property. <br /> • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2289. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Zoning District. The property consists of <br /> 4.4 acres. • <br /> 3. On January 20, 1998, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application , <br /> as proposed and recommended approval based on the following findings: <br /> a. A University of Minnesota extension educator specializing in animal <br /> feedlots indicated the pasture sites will not negatively affect the <br /> waterways or neighborhood. <br /> b. Pasture #1 is not considered a feedlot as it allows more than 1 acre per <br /> animal unit. This pasture meets the 75' lakeshore setback. Pasture #2 <br /> is considered a feedlot as it allows less than 1 acre per animal unit. This <br /> • pasture meets the 300' feedlot setback from waterways. Exhibit A is the <br /> survey depicting the location of the pastures. <br /> Page 1 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.