Laserfiche WebLink
toning rile 11027 <br />June S, 1986 <br />Page 3 of l <br />Ydi tiaoa.L Caro to and P 1 ann i ng Corsi s s i o n Racaarsâ–şdat ice <br />h soticin to approve the Height var .ance failed by a vote of 6 to <br />2. Members failed to formally vote to Aeny the Pil1*bt.ry applicatim <br />but the intent of the majority was clear. <br />The applicant's representatives were well warned that privacy <br />fends and walls are highly sensitive issues - especially for the put <br />year. The majority recommended natural plantings in place of 6 feet <br />high walls. The 'bricking in* effect of lakeshore lots dons not moot <br />the intent of the Code or Comprehensive Plan. <br />The minori nfiruod the need to screen the property from noise <br />and lights in sideration of the curve on County Road 15 as it <br />approaches Brackett* Point Road going eastward. The Pil.sbury lot has <br />been defined as a 'tight lot' requiring special lsoascaping and <br />properly placed screening to offset the only locatic: for the house in <br />the lakeshore yard and the unique angles of intersecting roadways. <br />The applicant ha, indeed demonstrated physical hardships. <br />comrcil Action: <br />To give staff conceptual direct ior, in otder to prepare the <br />appropriate r eso 1 ut ioc, for Cc. nci 1 art i r. At next meeting. <br />