Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To: Planning Commission Fromi: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Dste: March 12, 1985 Subject: 0895 Thomas Crosby, Jr., 1240-1260 Brackett's Point Road Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement =oning District - LR-lA, 2 Acre Lakeshore Residential Unsewered Application - Lot line rearrangement between existing property with house and adjacent vacant land. List of lhrhibits Exhibit A - Application ` Transmittal Letter Exhibit B - Property Owners List and Plat Map Exhibit C - Survey Exhibit D1, D2, D3 - Plat Maps With Proposed Realignment Exhibit E - Elevations, Pillsbury Lot Exhibit F - Drainfield Site Locations, Pillsbury Lot The applicant is requesting approval of a lot line rearrangement on Bra ,;.-!tt's Point. The involved properties include the 0.92 acre Crosby lot with existing house, and the vacant Pillsbury pr�lnerty consisting of 3 parcels totaling 2.01 acre-. The proposal would result in an increase in size of the Crosby lot to 1.15 acres and reduction of the Pillsbury lot to 1.78 acres. Both the pruperties are relatively low, mostly less than 5' above lake level. The existinq septic system for the Crosby house was inspected in Fall 1984 and appears to be quite functional. A new water softener discharge drainfield was added last fall. Because of the low elevations, Mr. Pillsbury did have septic testing done on the south end of his vacant property. A specially designed "mound" drainfield system would be required in order to meet current codes if a new house is ever constructed. .n addition, por- tions of the southwesterly quadrant of this lot are below elevation 931.5, or within the protected Flood Fringe District, hence any fil- linq or grading in this area would be subject to a CUP, and MCWD and DUR review. The low area does not continue to the lakeshore, and will need some study to determine whether fillinq would be detrimental. Based on the draintit•ld site location-, and the low land at the site, the subdivision does slightly decrease the possible buildinq envelope for the Pil lshury lot. Note, however, that a line of existing trees near the north end of the lot does seem to move ILhe logical house site further to the south. In addition, the subdivis.on does decreaaf• this lot to u►.du r two acres, so that any future proposal to bui Id can it wi l 1 also require a lot area variance. Mr. Pi I I sbury should Iw madt• aware, of this now to Avoid any future surprises. 1