06-08-1987 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF '.►HE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1119 W. DUNCAN MACMILLAN CONT. Counci. I members Sime and Goetten expressed their concern over the possible subdivision of the property. They stated that an acreage condition needed to be a part of the res-lution of approval. and that their support. of the application was based in part on that understanding. Mr. McNulty noted that the owners have made no attempt to date to subdivide the property, however, it is in t.: e 2 acre zone and at some future date this may become a desirable option. City Administrator Bernhardson noted one minor amendment in the Resolution, Page 5; Condition #7 should read as follows: "recording of resolution and the covenants in the chain of title. . ." Councilmember Sime stated he is in favor of staying at the 13+ acres, and if they wart to change it they can come before the Council at a later date. Councilmember Callahan noted he also feels they should stay at the 13 acre minimum. Also, he would like to amend the Resolution, Page 2, #C by deleting the following: "Additionally, the City ordinances would allow . . . both should be treated similarly." It was moved by Mayor. Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to table acceptance of the resolution with the amended chanles to give Mr. McNulty time to review the minimum acreage and inability to subdivide the property at a future date with the owners and this item to be brought back to the •June 8th meeti.nq. Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. #1135 ROBERT HANNING, JR. 4220 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2183 No one was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explairied that Council had directed staff on a 3-2 vote to draft a resolution approving the proposed variance for a berm to extend up to 11' above the crown of the road on private property. Councilmember Callahan asked staff if the resolution was worded in such a way as to protect the wet lands adjacent to the berm and staff concurred that. it did. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Coun:•i l member Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2183 per stafF and Planning Commission recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Mayor Grabek voted nay stating he did not like the thought of having an 11' berm along 600' of roadway with a small break for the driveway. I