My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
06-08-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2026 12:05:22 PM
Creation date
3/23/2026 11:51:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
409
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING i;ij.D AUGUST 18, 1986 <br />11039 ULRICH CONTINUED <br />McDonald stated that. two precedents would be set being <br />1) allowing the system without proof of hardship; 2) <br />opening up this type of system bein al"Lowed fir <br />everybody, of which impact concerns her. <br />Goetten stated that she agreed with McDonald, she is <br />concerned ab,)ut the aqu.,fer. She noted that she feels <br />there has been enough variances, conditional Ise <br />permits, land alterations etc. on this property and she <br />refuses to grant anything else. <br />#191-X4 OLAI HANSON <br />13 90 RAILFOAD AVENUE <br />VARIANCE <br />CONTINUATION OF FUBLIr' t'F:ArTNG 7:34 - 7:r-n <br />01 <br />H ,n was present for this matter. <br />Assistant Zoi.ir,g Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />conflicting surveys. He submitted the survey which <br />staff feels they are bound to accept as tie correct <br />survey from Mr. Hanson. This survey shows the Goldin <br />3rage over onto Hanson's property. <br />Frances Golden was present for this matter and stated <br />that he protests this application and still maintains <br />that his survey dated in 1.950 should be honored due to <br />the statute of limitations. <br />Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission must <br />act on staff's recommendation of the correct skiry v and <br />if Mr. Golden does not agree with their recominer.' on, <br />he should get his facts in order and submit the.:, the <br />City Council and City Attc,rney. <br />Mrs. Golden stated that they felt the proposed garage <br />would be detr.imental to their c, :en. <br />Rovegno suggested that the Planning Commission eliminate <br />discussion on which survey is correct and act on a <br />reasonable compromise locations i.e. 7' from lot line <br />rather than the proposed 4' from lot line. <br />Mr. Hanson stated that. to move the garage over to tt, <br />10' setback line woul -reate a problem with maneu •erirLg <br />the car into the garage and spoil the backyard. <br />Bellows stated that she agreed with applicants reasons <br />on the garage location. <br />Chairman Feiley asked why the q.Arage could not be placed <br />4' to thr- south. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.