06-08-1987 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1d the t.ru ct \. He trent tatter a, to tion, �ling • � the 1there p the back) new Be tther �ty's oved the , to ject the ·ing. ling IUIIUTBS OP TBB PLADI,IIG COMMISSION MBBTiliG HELD JOLY 21, 1986 11056 BAIISO■ continued Olai & Hilda Hanson were present for this matter . Ass istant Zoning Administra tor Gaf fro n explained the requ est to constru ct a 20' x 24' detached garage 5' -7.5' from the side yard lot line requir ing a variance. He noted that the applicants survey indicates the neigh bor's , Frances Go lden, 1380 Rai lro ad Ave., gara ge is located on the applican ts prop erty. To d ay, Frances Go lde n sub mitted his own survey dated in 1950 which indicates the garage locat ed 2.7' from the lot line. Both the applicant and Mr . Go lden have indicated that there was a court action in 1971 that affected the lot line. Staff re commends tabling this matter in order to determine the actual lot li ne. Fran ces Go lden was present for this matter. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, secon.ded by Callahan, to table this matter and continue the Public He aring to the Au gu st 18, 1986 Planning Commiss ion meeting. Motion , Aye s 6, Nays 0 . 11026 IIID BJLBBLlD/JOBII VOGT 160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD P8BI,tNIIIARY SOBDIVISIO■RBPBRltBD BACK TO PC BY COUIICIL Applicants Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for this matter . Zoning Administra tor Mabusth explained that the Council referre d this pre liminary subdivision plar1 back to the Planning Commission for them to address future access in re lation to this pro p erty. Sh e expla ined the staff's re com mendation for fu ture acc esses proposing a north/south link from Wa tertown Rd. to Wo odhaven Dr. along the east prop erty line of Lots 2 & 3. Mr. Hilbe link sta ted he obje cted to staff's prop osal because that area is the only area of trees on the prop erty . He als o obje cted to ta king a 50-60 easeme nt on his property for a future road when he does not intend any high density developm ent and would serve to benefit the prop erty to the east. He stated that he did not feel the pr oposed throug hro ad was the most centra l locati on for it, re commending a throu ghroa d on the east lot line of the Hallson estate plat .