My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-1987 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
06-08-1987 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2026 12:05:22 PM
Creation date
3/23/2026 11:51:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
409
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Planning Commission Members <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Administrator <br />Date: August 14,1986 <br />Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - <br />Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/21/86 <br />Exhibit B - Staff Memo a.id Exhibits of 7/17/86 Including <br />Additional. Survey Exhibit.-, D-2 and ^-3 <br />This item was tabled at your July 21st meeting pending staff review of <br />the objection by Mr. Golden, the northerly neighbor, regarding conflicting <br />surveys. <br />Item 1 - Conflicting Surveys <br />Mr. Golden has submitted a survey dated in 1950 that shows his <br />property to wholly contain his garage with 2.7 feet of setback. A 1971 <br />survey submitted by Hanson • '^ows Golden's garage 0.25 feet over the line <br />into Hanson's lot. The garagt- has not moved. <br />Item 2 - Lawsuit Over Hanson's South Lot Line <br />In 1971, Mr. Hanson sued his neighbor LaQuey to the south because of a <br />similar conflict in lot lines. LaQuey apparently had a survey done which <br />showed his lot l ' overlapp, o what Hanson felt was his property <br />based on old su• takes. The district court ruled that there was no <br />basis to revise ne's legal description, no basis for "adverse <br />possession" ancl, he line as shown on LaQuey's newer survey would <br />stand. Hanson ccr ntly had his lot re -surveyed and it, too, showed <br />that the old stake., a apparently wrong. Mr. Hanson's new survey, as a <br />result, also showea fiat the old pins between Hanson and Golden were <br />apparently wrong. <br />Item 3 - Golden's Objection Regarding Lot Line Location <br />Golden, in his objection, is relying on a 1950 survey which he <br />accepted as correctly represer,"ing his property boundaries when he bought <br />the property. He stated he was told by someone that his lot line was not <br />changed as a result of Hansons suit with LaQuey. It is apparent that the <br />legal description., did not .--hange, but that the original survey pins <br />apparently were placed incc actl- based on a problem with a reference <br />point in Spates Avenue. <br />It is likely that if Mr. Golden wculd have a neN survey done it -ould <br />show the lot line consistent with Hanson's survey. It appears l.kely that <br />Golden's garage is over onto Hanson's property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.