Laserfiche WebLink
Peterson as~ed why there needs to be two entrances. <br />Mrs. Jundt responded that they want the caretakers to have their own private entrance. <br />Schroeder explained that the issue for the City is that a private entrance might indicate an <br />intent to rent the unit and asked whether they planned to rent out the unit. He commented that <br />one way to prohibit rental of the unit. would be to have the principle access through the main <br />house. <br />Mrs. Jundt:replied that her intent is not to rent the unit but to have a caretaker living on site. <br />Peterson commented that the two stairways leading from the lower level seem so close that it <br />didn't seem necessary to have an additional access. <br />The architect for the project explained the stairs seem close on the second floor level but that <br />they are not close at the bottom. <br />Mabusth noted that the second stairway serves as access from the garage to the kitchen and <br />eventually to the second floor. <br />It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend for approval of application <br />#1866 for James and Joann Jundt for conditional use permit required for caretaker apartment <br />within the second floor of the main house as proposed. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. <br />#1867 <br />Mrs. Jundt was concerned about the hardship statement that involves the boathouse and steps. <br />See Exhibit K, # 1. Their plans are not to abandon the boathouse and steps as the property has <br />historical significance and they want to assess all factors before making a decision on lakeshore <br />improvements. <br />Rowlette explained that it has been the City's intent to remove non-conforming structures <br />within the 0-75' that begin to deteriorate and that applicant would have to work closely with <br />the City on any repair or changes to this structure. <br />Mabusth explained that the stone steps near the boathouse are figured in the hardcover <br />calculations. · <br />Architect clarified the size of the deck as well as the purpose of the deck. It will be used for <br />storage of dock sections, and not for sitting or viewing. <br />Mabusth stated that there are no particular regulation regarding the light on the deck. <br />Lindquist asked what it would look like. <br />Architect stated that it would be a decorative, low intensity type light fixture. <br />19