Laserfiche WebLink
Rowlette asked if the dock would connect to the deck. <br />Architect stated that it would have to be connected. <br />Schroeder asked what is normally done with dock sections when they are pulled from the water. <br />Architect replied that they are usually laid on the lawn. <br />Schroeder stated that bis concern is having a (narrowly defined) structure in the 0-75' area. <br />However, he felt the proposed structure was reasonable for dock storage. <br />Schroeder noted that the concern with the structure is that if it is used as sitting or viewing area, <br />there may be many such requests for similar structures. <br />Mrs. Jundt commented that the deck was planned based on the size of the dock. <br />Rowlette stated concern about the fact that there are three stairways: <br />Mabusth noted the code does not limit a property to a specific number of decks. <br />It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend approval of application #1867 <br />for James and Joann Jundt for variance of a structure within the 0-75' and hardcover within <br />the 0-75', repair of existing accessory structures within the 0-7 5' will require approval, and that <br />deck be used only for dock storage. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. <br />#1868 <br />Mabusth explained that the application involves a conditional use permit for a guest house with <br />a caretaker apartment and greenhouse as well as residential garages. The applicant is not <br />proposing any improvements but staff felt it would be appropriate to advise the applicant to <br />obtain a conditional use permit. It is an oversized accessory structure and does not meet the <br />required side setback. · <br />Schroeder asked where we stand with septic. <br />Mabusth explained that the property would be subject to new interim ordinance because the <br />City is evaluating the triggers for when s01neone has to replace a septic system because of the <br />separation problems with issuance of a building permit for improvements. On-site septic <br />inspections will continue. Residents have two years to repair them. This is a non-conforming <br />septic system. <br />Schroeder asked if a decision made on this application would affect the septic issue in any way. <br />Mabusth responded that it would not because this matter has been covered under the permit <br />for this property. <br />20