Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION l\!IEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 (#3 -#2169¥~hael Renard -Continued) // Lindquist asked, what the hardcover facts were. Mabusth asked for a 91,kdown of the hardcover calcull:l:!i?ns and whether it inclu?ed th.e landscaping. ~o/s~owed the survey to Mabusth, who ci,td not have a copy of this particular survey. D15cuss1on was had on the particulars of the halr;£cover.. It was det~rrnined that if the l~.v OJ ".'f. of landscape rock in the 0-75' was removed, al"Qng with 420 s.f m the 75-250' setbacj( there would be no need for a hardcover variance. S~hroeder said he was concerned ~(h trading of plastic and rock as it should not have been tli:ere in the first place. The plasu'c was installed by a previous owner. Schroeder said. th.e \~rd cover should ~e sep~r,,r{ed showing what does a?d does not count. Mabusth said 1t w~uld not be reqmred ~ere was no hardcover vanance required in the 7.5-250' setback\~~.d would only i3/olve the average la~eshore setback. Schroeder questioned whether tl\is was actuall~own. Mabusth clanfied that the hardcover total was originally 614~ 1 s .. f. ~r 26 ?!% ~here 5707 s.f. is allowed. With the removal of the 420 s.f. of landscape+,,rock a plastic, the square footage of hardcover would be at 24.9% and not require a\rari ce. ·), . ' Smith asked why the shed was anr· ss i"1;i 1991. Mabusth said it was because the hardcove\ exceeded the allowed at 6. 7o/o\ With the shed removal, the hardcover would be at 25.51/o. ff \ There were no public commf \ Schroeder said he was reluctant to allow the shed since the Council in 1991 recommended its removal with the sanl' basic numbers present~p. Lindquist noted that the structure was proposed larger at that1time. Mabusth said there ' as also more hardcover and the updated survey was /ot available. Mabusth said th removal of plastic and rock would result in a 1.8% re I ction from 26.7% to 24.9%. t Lindquist move , Hawn seconded, to recommend apprwal of Application #2169 with the .. understanding hat all plastic on the property would be reluoved along with the cement pad located · the 0-75' setback. The application would o~y involve a variance to the average lak shore setback, and the shed would be allowed td\ emain. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays r·-----2..:...--~---'--------------- (#4) #2159 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:30-7:54 P.M. The Applicant was present. Gaffron reported that the application was tabled at the request of the applicant at the August 19 meeting of the Planning Commission. He noted that the application has been revised by the withdrawal of the boathouse from the application. 7