My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4072
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4000 - 4099 (November 10, 1997 - June 22, 1998)
>
Resolution 4072
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
11/18/2015 11:50:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M` ` � . <br /> O . <br /> � � � <br /> � O O <br /> ��b. - . C ITY of ORONO <br /> � ' ti � <br /> '�' � RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . ���kE Hpg'�G . . NO. �. � `� � " <br /> � S <br /> A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br /> � VARIANCES TO � <br /> • MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br /> FILE #2362 <br /> WHEREAS, Robert E. Howard and Bazbara Howard (hereinafter "the � <br /> applicants") are owners of the property located at 1300 Shoreline Drive within the City of <br /> � Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: � � <br /> Lots 10, 11, and 12, Block 14, Minnetonka Bluffs, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WI�REAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal <br /> � Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow construction of,a new residence. <br /> Variances for lot area, lot width, front, side, ancl_rear setbacks are required. <br /> � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2362. <br /> � 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Zoning District where the minimum lot <br /> . area requirement is 2 acres in area. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 20, 1998, <br /> and recommended unanimous approval of the proposed variances based upon the <br /> following unique findings and hardships: <br /> A. The existing residence was destroyed by fire and cannot be rehabilitated. . <br /> It is more than 75% damaged. <br /> Page 1 of 5 <br /> � . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.