Laserfiche WebLink
While I do not the know the intent of that language when crafted <br />so long ago, the language seems extremely strong and harsh for <br />any permitted dock holder. <br /> <br />Given the harshness of this language, it would seem reasonable <br />to find a solution does not create a win-lose scenario. <br /> <br />Existing Dock Permit Dated June 1983 <br /> <br /> <br />One potential resolution for the council to consider would be to <br />create a new permit where both #480 and #230 are named in the <br />permit, the old permit is retired and we share a dock, each permit <br />holder having a side. <br /> <br />This solution is designed so owners at 230 Big Island are not <br />materially impacted, they still retain their permitted dock rights to <br />access their property and allows me access to my property. While <br />this is not the perfect solution it does balance the needs of each <br />party and would work to limit the impact on the existing construct <br />that exists today. <br />