My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LA21-000017 (480 Big Island) Ex E Draft PC Min
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
480 Big Island - 23-117-23-32-0062
>
Land Use
>
LA21-000017, CUP
>
CC 04122021
>
LA21-000017 (480 Big Island) Ex E Draft PC Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2026 1:08:45 PM
Creation date
3/12/2026 1:08:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, March 15, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />there was precedence, and it was valued at $9,000. Ms. Farnes stated it makes it unsellable, and their <br />investment in real estate, and their retirement, is now gone over one dock permit that was properly secured <br />through the proper channels that had a boat since 1942 with that cabin. Initially it was a handshake on the <br />family to the owners. When Ms. Farnes’ family bought it, it converted to this permit. The only permit they <br />created for this unique property and unique situation. <br /> <br />Ressler thinks it will be difficult to read through the handout on the fly. <br /> <br />Curtis believes the materials Ms. Farnes has provided were emailed to the Commissioners this afternoon. <br /> <br />Ms. Farnes said [off microphone] there are photos. <br /> <br />Ressler clarified for those watching online, the comments were that the handout included some photos <br />reiterating the difficulty of being inclusive of adding more dockage. <br /> <br />Chris Bollis, 470 Big Island, is just adjacent to the Applicant’s property. He only wants to comment about <br />access on the west side of the island. There is a road right-of-way that comes in – he does not know if it <br />has a name – it is just by 460 Big Island. <br /> <br />Curtis pointed it out on screen. <br /> <br />Mr. Bollis said that is probably the only vehicle access on Big Island where one can drive from the ice or <br />from a barge right up on there. He noted they have used that for septic pumping, well drilling, and in 2005 <br />(he thinks) there was a big fire on the south end of the island and they hauled in fire departments, pumps, <br />food, bobcats, and it was a big problem. He wants to say that the access by 460 Big Island should not be <br />considered as a dockage area because it is the only spot one can get on the island with any size of a vehicle <br />to do the service work that is required. <br /> <br />Ted Hanna, 480 Big Island, said that however many years ago this thing was platted out – the spirit of the <br />whole plat to allow people access to their interior lots – he thinks that is something that should be considered <br />for future use, as well. As Ms. Farnes said, they combined a bunch of lots so it cut it down but there could <br />have been a bunch more people there asking for it. He thinks that was the spirit of the whole thing, to have <br />roads and not just for fire access. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:59 p.m. <br /> <br />Ressler noted this is a tough one. <br /> <br />Kirchner said first and foremost from what they have heard at the public hearing, he does not believe that <br />there is ill-intent upon the Applicant to revoke the existing permit 2038. He does not believe that was the <br />intent but is just an unfortunate wording. Regarding the permit, he noted Staff, City Council, and City <br />Attorney could have further discussion on this - he does see at the bottom it states that the City of Orono <br />further reserves the right to review this permit for any reason as deemed appropriate. Kirchner would say <br />this would qualify as a reason to review it rather than to automatically revoke it. Therefore, that may give <br />some leeway and some time. He agrees with Ressler’s remarks that this is not a black and white, just <br />because there has been an application there should be a revocation of this permit. With that said, he <br />appreciates the Applicant’s due diligence in exploring options, speaking with City Staff, evaluating those
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.