Laserfiche WebLink
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND PERMIT <br />WHEREAS the DNR permit 50-8 which permitted creation of the <br />existing harbor and channel imposed as a condition thereon that the <br />same "shall be considered public waters and shall be left open and <br />unobstructed for navigation by the public", Paragraph IV thereof. <br />WHEREAS the present channel depth of less than half that re- <br />quired in the permit constitutes an obstruction to navigation by the <br />public and is therefore violative of the public interest. <br />WHEREAS the Flood Plain purposes of the City of Orono are not <br />adversely affected by maintenance of the channel since the absence of <br />such maintenance will not preserve wetlands as its poli^ies require. <br />WHEREAS non -dredging which may convert wetlands from public <br />waters is not a stated objective of the City's ordinances. <br />WHEREAS non -dredging may not create wetlands or even if it <br />does that the process may entail years of open, stagnant water with mos- <br />quito bret— :nrj, stench and other ;ossible nuisance aspects injurious <br />to riparian owners and t'­ public. <br />WHEREAS, current DNR rules as a matter of general policy dis- <br />favor dredging and channeling in public waters make express exception <br />for maintenance dredging of channels to existing boat harbors, 6 MCAR <br />§1.5022 H.2.b. <br />W11EREAS, the DNR rules reflect a policy to protect the existing <br />natural character of public waters and their existing shorelands and <br />that doing so meets the Orono requirement of showing the applicant's <br />interest as being in the public interest, 6 MCAR S1.5022 A. entitled <br />Policy and General Restri tions. <br />WHEREAS the existing harbor and channel constitute a pre-existing <br />non -conforming use and the request for maintenance dredging therefore <br />constitutes maintenance of a non -conforming use rather than its en- <br />largement or replacement and therefore complies with City ordinances <br />governing non -conforming uses. <br />WHEREAS continued use of the harbor for boat docking rather <br />than construction of a long dock on the shallows lakeward from other <br />riparian access of the applicant mitiyat.es visual imposition of visible <br />