Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING CCM%J SSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 18 #881 KRUTZIG HOMES 5. That the additional hardcover is not necessary, to maintain a substantial property right. 6. This problem of hardcover was brought on by the applicant. Krutzig clarified that he was not aware of hardcover, he bad his plans done according to the setbacks, structural engineer had worked on the plans, and all those plans had to be submitted at one time. At the time they were submitted was the time that Gaffron called and saie we have a hardcover problem. Krutzig stated that he had at that time already spent $7500. He stated he had the option to drop his plans or continue on the basis that he apply for hardcover variance. Krutzig also asked if a pool is considered hardcover. Rovegno clarified that a pool is not considered hardcover, the deck is but the pool has its own closed recirculating movment. It doesn't drain, it collects. Motion, Aye (6), Nay (0). FENCE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Mabusth clarified that she would like the input sheets back to her by December 10, 1984. Rovegno questioned how long grading has to si` there before it becomes existing grade? I feel if we have a reference point that you know will be consistant and then setting a height from that point. Rovegno feels that the fence issue should be addressed as a total case including commercial and residential. Mabusth noted that Council asked that only the residential fence ordinance be looked at. They also asked that controls be considered for privacy fences that are constructed as accessory structures. Another issue is protecting the view of neighbors. Al l of the sa;.,ple cor' - submitted for this review deal with protection i adjoining property not protection for the persc on the other side of a major thoroughfare.