My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1629 Bohns Point Road - 17-117-23-11-0005
>
Land Use
>
90-1556, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2026 10:34:10 AM
Creation date
3/10/2026 9:56:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: August 7, 1990 <br />Subject: #1556 Mr. & Mrs. Gerald Nelson, 1.629 Bohns Point Road - <br />Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-1B, Single family lakeshore residential, 1 <br />acre, sewered <br />Application - Request for hardcover variance to construct room <br />addition over existing grade -level hardcover area. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit - Planning Commission Action Notice 7/17/90 <br />Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes 7/16/90 <br />Exhibit C - Memo & Fxhi_bits of 7/9/90 <br />Discussion <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of July 9, 1990, and the <br />Planning Commission minutes. Briefly, the applicants request a <br />hardcover variance to enclose a 71x10' existing hardcovered <br />alcove to create a closet. Although the existing hardcover <br />percentage would not increase, a hardcover review determined that <br />the hardcover existing as of June 1990 exceeds the hardcover <br />approved in a previous resolution by 1,051 s.f. (allowed 25%, <br />existing today is 30.6%); <br />As staff noted in the Planning Commission memo, the City's <br />ability to monitor hardcover increases on a given property is <br />constrained by a number of fact.urs. In this specific <br />application, the excessive drJveway and sidewalk areas were <br />apparently constructed before the applicant purchased the <br />property. <br />In discussing the hardcovet excesses with the Planning <br />Commission, applicants felt that the existing driveways and side- <br />walks were just adequate for the property, and while hardcover is <br />excessive numerically the existing improvements are functionally <br />appropâșiate for the house. They felt that removals of existing <br />sidewalks or driveway would be a problem. <br />The existing 5,776 s.f. of hardcover is 30.6% of the 75-250' <br />zone. This does not include the deck on the west side, which was <br />specifically approved as non -hardcover (see July 9th memo). This <br />also does not include the rock beds which have a fabric <br />underliner which was generally allowed at the time this house was <br />constructed. These rock beds have been estimated by staff at <br />approximately 600 s.f. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.