Laserfiche WebLink
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: April 17, 1987 <br />Subject: #1115/1.116 Paul Boyke 795 N. Ferndale Road <br />- Easement Vacation - Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />This item was tabled at your 3-16-87 meeting so that applicant could <br />provide additional information. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Topographic Survey <br />Exhibit B - Septic Testing S:te Map - Alt. Site For Existing House <br />Exhibit C - Notice Of Planning Commission Action 3-26-87 <br />Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 3-11-87 <br />Discussion: <br />The applicant has submitted a topographic survey of the site, <br />indicating the proposed driveway grading plan. That driveway can be <br />located as originally proposed with road c*rades of 0-10% with only minor <br />excavation or fill required. Where the driveway parallels the north lot <br />line, it is proposed to be about 7' from the existing garage, and 15' from <br />the lot line at the closest point, with side slopes of. about 3:1 for most <br />of that length, which should be adequate tc maintain a vegetative cover. <br />This also leaves room to provide whatever screening might be necessary <br />depending on the angle of headlights toward neighborin3 homes on Hollander <br />Road. <br />Applicant has alsc provided alternate site septic testing for the <br />existing residence; the alternate site is shown on the topographic survey. <br />The driveway access alternative to the south would seem to pose a <br />problem for the proposed nouse location with a garage proposed for the 1st <br />story level. The initial problem would be the cutting and filling <br />necessary to flatten the 19% slope area along the 30' corridor. There <br />would be a fairly gentle grade northward to the house, then a steeper slope <br />uphill again to the garage level. Alternatively, a driveway could be cut <br />across the slope on an easement below the existing house, but would require <br />a relatively wide cut and fill that aesthetically is not what applicants <br />see as acceptable. <br />Applicant -rotes that driveway along north lot line will be graced to <br />slope to the sc ch so that runoff goes away from the northerly boundary. <br />Satf f Recerendat ion <br />A. Staff recommends approval of the vacation of drainage and utility <br />easements along existing interior lot lines subject to granting <br />similar easements along the newly configured lot lines. <br />