|
Mr. Mark Bernha'dson
<br />Februa ; 12, 1967
<br />raga two
<br />and Larry Hanson then proceeded tc detai' _he 1artr of the
<br />Corridor Study which directly impacted on t Reber.:, Inc.,
<br />parcel and Rebe, Inc.'s reaction to th s3rif, . liese
<br />observations may c. ;ummarized as follows:
<br />1. We commented that the proposed lan% VSL ljnder the
<br />Corridor Study -etains B-1 zoning (busin4ss/office;Ll:nmercial)
<br />for approyimatei., ten acres of ?ropertl No. d abutting High�.ay 12
<br />and RR-1.3 zoning (rural. resldent.i•al sirigle-family/ acre minirnum
<br />lot size) for the 35-odd acre rer,:aini:ng portio., the site.
<br />Rebers, inc., does not object to this zoning whit the 1: ed
<br />Exceptions elaborated below. We suggested that the bnur.dary 1_ne
<br />between the B-1. and `..he Rr-lB zoning be moved slightly to t'
<br />rth pe-mit better ar,velopment it tit se-1 Vice o_: 1 I late
<br />thin :e ,:onx:e-_cial area, as is discusse, more .._e'.::il
<br />2. Wt crnament�_ d that we were aware '-'�e - roposed i rmi.nati(.n
<br />of North Bro,, Road short: of P; ghway 12 we
<br />contioversi < < .
<br />but c.a a+- Reba-.3. Tnt_:., could live with, ar
<br />-York with the
<br />Ci ty .�r of 'F Le Lwo alterna`.iv._ .
<br />c: - in the
<br />arridor ,-ay, rta,,��_ly:
<br />A) Lr r -minate Brown Road *earth of
<br />Hig.., ? and to
<br />-eroute the �a'rie through the Fe' "I.. Inc.
<br />, r arL to oin
<br />Highway 12 approx mately opposit
<br />-.iv, or
<br />(u) '_; keep Brown Road c
<br />a �_<_r�,.ce road
<br />r-nr:-ctint P. ow7 (-.ad to
<br />tie a .jgestet a this? r'. •+rnat:.
<br />service road
<br />directly fr . Bro-b •&%: to willow 1►ut
<br />riot o ter,4+• *�
<br />Bto-n Roar'. We s", to&-ed that ti,c . ar: lti,iq
<br />oz Brown :,
<br />finf the cc ^,ruct -)n of a ser•,ice road)
<br />be through that
<br />,ter -)f the R6, =rs, I: - . , parcel that was zoned 8-1.
<br />Our logic it sc iggerting was =hat we anticipated a
<br />relatively heavy t.affic volume on this segment cif tb.d rcad, and
<br />wished to ins ' to the resi'ential area to the north from such
<br />•r "fie 7urc . ., we suggested that the road be routed in su..h a
<br />•s�ior. _hat ccimmero:-i1 ]n*a c. uld be ut, ` '.se:' cl th north side
<br />well as the sc t `de of -h servi :e -)a,+ or rerouted Browr
<br />Road, in order to f, _ . der i^ .ate the rt ►c.ential area fi -n, t'.t
<br />tra'lic.
<br />3. We cot rated that Reb%.rs, Inc., way prepar-A to
<br />cooperate utth the city, sholrld the City de3:re to connc he
<br />proposed R*NerP. Inca.. . ..ential devele-went nn the northe_
<br />
|