Laserfiche WebLink
connection of this frontage road across Daniel Street <br />as an issue they would like to address. Orono stan,'s <br />open for discussion on this matter. As the primary coal <br />for Orono is to eliminate direct access on Ilwy 12 <br />togetaer with an intercorridor access point south of Hwy <br />12, north of the railroad between Willow and Old Crystal <br />Bay. <br />C. Water Service - The presentation by the City <br />Engineer For Long lake indicated that they would discuss <br />the issue of water service with the City. It was <br />indicated that in addition to extension being at <br />developers cost, there may be accompanying connection <br />charges. <br />D. Sewer - Currently Long Lake feels that there is <br />concern regarding the amount of allocation they have <br />together with the "firmness" of the numbers that Orono <br />is working with regarding the expansion. As has <br />previously been indicated during the study and also at <br />the Planning Commission public hearings that the number <br />of units that are increased will be based on negotiation <br />between the 3 cities in the agreement and the attendant <br />cost of expansion. Given that any zoning to be achieved <br />in this corridor must demonstrate adequate capacity, it <br />is not an issue that can be fully addressed at this <br />point. <br />Once the Council has considered it both at March 30 and <br />also at the April 27, 1987 and should they desire to give their <br />preliminary approval it may be appropriate that the Orono Council <br />and the Long Lake Council establish a special joint meeting to <br />discuss this issue '.ogether with other issues of cor.non interest <br />including fire and police service etc. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council hear all <br />-Comments that various groups may have regarding this plan done on <br />an area by area basis commencing with the areas of minimal change <br />and then going on to the areas where changes suggested leaving <br />discussion on area 4 until the meeting on April 27, 1987. <br />In addition the staff would recommend the document include <br />mention of a trails plan as noted in Attachment F. It was the <br />inter,1- that this be originally included but it was an oversight <br />in the drafting of the plan. At present a specific grap.iic <br />layout is not appropriat_o as it should blend wit'l t_he eventual <br />rr_),jd plan. <br />Planninq Commission did indicate that. in the liscus;sion of <br />housin7 can page 61 that tho term non-traditional. single family <br />housing be usf-d rc ther than multi -family development because of <br />contontations that may Carty with it as it rel3ts,ss to apartments. <br />PP.('''OSED MOTION - Movoii key r.,eCOMIC-1 t"; that the Council <br />accept information rf-i and i n•.i Comprvhon,- r v,; !I l ar: Arr.endment and <br />