My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bracketts Point Road
>
1220 Bracketts Point Road - 11-117-23-32-0018
>
Land Use
>
06-3220, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2026 2:27:04 PM
Creation date
3/5/2026 2:25:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, August 21, 2006 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />#06-3210 Steven Webster and Sandra Larson, Continued) <br />There were no public comments regarding the application. <br />Bremer closed the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. <br />Rahn moved, Bremer seconded, to recommend approval of Application #06-3210, Steven and Jo <br />Webster, 500 Orono Orchard Road South, and Kent and Sandra Larson, 540 Orono Orchard Road <br />South, vacation of an alley and lot line rearrangement, subject to staff conditions outlined in the <br />August 16, 2006 Planner's report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />6. #06-3220 JULE AND ELIZABETH HANNAFORD, 1220 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, <br />VARIANCE -7:05 P.M. -7:58 P.M. <br />Elizabeth Hannaford, Applicant, and Herb Baldwin, Landscape Architect, were present. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting 0-75-foot and 75-250-foot hard<::over variances as well as a lake <br />setback variance in order to replace the existing lakeside deck with a new, lower-profile deck and remove <br />hardcover within the 0-75-foot zone. The existing deck encroaches almost completely into the 75-foot <br />setback as a result of the location of the home, which has existed on the property since 1954. The <br />applicant is proposing to remove the existing deck as well as a two-foot wide concrete path to the lake <br />and other miscellaneous hardcover. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of variances in order to rebuild the lakeside deck and rear entry <br />stoop; however, the applicant should be directed to reduce both the size of the deck and the level of <br />hardcover on the property as a whole. <br />Staff recommends denial of the lake setback variance to allow a greater encroachment towards the lake . <br />Baldwin stated this project began with the issue of the deck and its need for repair. It was a pre-existing <br />deck at the time the Hannafords purchased the property approximately 11 years ago . Both decks are in <br />need of repair . The Hannafords are planning to remove the existing cedar decking and would be using <br />ironwood, which is an extremely hard and serviceable deck and will probably outlast the house. The deck <br />is one of the things the property owners feel is important to the property. Baldwin indicated the <br />Hannafords have a large family and use the entire deck. <br />Baldwin illustrated on the overhead the access to the proposed deck and the deck that exists . Baldwin <br />stated what currently happens is that the traffic is funneled onto the walkway and that they are proposing <br />to lower the profile of the deck another six inches and utilizing wider steps to allow the people access to <br />the grass at all points along the deck rather than focusing the traffic in one area. The amount of hardcover <br />would be reduced from what currently exists. <br />Baldwin explained the dry , s tacked bluestone w alls that currently ex ist are not retaining w all s and are <br />there as buffers . Baldwi n indicated pri v ac y is a problem and they are proposing a lo w w all w ith some <br />PAG E S
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.