Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA18-000076 <br />17 Sept 2018 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />Comments from the neighbor are attached. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the proposed expansion is necessary for <br />the property owner to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not <br />permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter <br />the essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission should carefully consider whether the applicant has satisfied the <br />practical difficulties standard for this proposed accessory structure expansion, and consider a <br />motion to approve or deny the requested variances as appropriate. <br /> <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Application Summary & Narrative <br />Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. Existing Survey <br />Exhibit D. Proposed Survey <br />Exhibit E. Proposed Boathouse Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit F. Existing Boathouse Plan <br />Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit H. Site Photos – Applicant <br />Exhibit I. Aerial Photos <br />Exhibit J. City Code Sections <br />Exhibit K. Neighbor Email <br />Exhibit L. Property Owner List <br />Exhibit M. Plat Map <br />