Laserfiche WebLink
( <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ~ <br />Monday, March 21, 2016 ~, <br />_______________ 6._·3_o_o_'c_Io_c_k_p_._m_. ______________ 1)'9.(!'" <br />A small portion of the existing house is located 65 feet from the lake, while the entire new house is <br />proposed to meet the required 75-foot lake setback. However, because the adjacent property to the south <br />is vacant, the required average lakeshore setback is defined by the setback from the lake of the adjacent <br />house to the north, which is 115 feet from the lake. <br />The majority of the properties along the east side of Bohns Point are much deeper than the applicants' <br />property and, as a result, the neighboring homes are set back at least 100 feet or more from the lake. <br />Absent a variance to the 115 foot setback, the applicants ' property will have a buildable envelope of 25 to <br />40 feet in depth and 120 feet in width, potentially resulting in a long, narrow home stretching from side <br />lot line to side lot line and likely not in character with the neighborhood. Staff feels the average lakeshore <br />setback variance is reasonable given the building envelope. <br />Gaffron noted the deck down by the lake as well as a patio will remain. <br />In addition, the applicants are requesting a variance to allow 27.2 percent hardcover where only 25 <br />percent is normally allowed. Existing hardcover on the site is 29.0 percent. The property is located in <br />Tier 1. The proposed hardcover on the property consists primarily of the house and driveway, with <br />sidewalks, steps and patios accounting for the remainder. The proposed house footprint is right at the 15 <br />percent structural coverage limit. The proposed hardcover is approximately 600 square feet over the 25 <br />percent limit. This amount is approximately equal to the area of the portion of driveway north of the <br />garage apron, which provides for the loop access and entry sidewalk. Gaffron stated it becomes a <br />question of how much house the applicants should be allowed to have versus the driveway and the <br />Planning Commission should consider whether further reductions in hardcover should be made. <br />Letters have been received from both adjacent property owners in support of the variance requests. <br />Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission determines that the practical difficulties test is met and the <br />variances are justified, then a recommendation for approval may be in order. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br />Page 15 of 32 <br />·~ )'