My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1535 Bohns Point Road - 08-117-23-44-0025
>
Land Use
>
86-1039, CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2026 9:54:22 AM
Creation date
3/5/2026 9:49:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAI2IC1N. lIOFFMAN. DALY C` I.I\U(;Itl-:\. I:r>>. <br />Mavor Butler and City Council Members <br />September 8, 1986 <br />Page 2 <br />currently pending before the City Council. <br />1. The City has no jurisdiction over the installation and use of the <br />geo-thermal heating and cooling system for Mr. 01rich's residence. <br />The appropriation of ground r for a geo-thermal heating and <br />cooling system is excl.usive.l, within the jurisdiction of the Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources. That en,-ity, acting pursuant to <br />authority granted to it by the State Legislature, has adopted a permit <br />process to control facilities such as the one Mr. Ulrich is <br />installing. Our client has fully complied with that process; and, in <br />fact, he has received a permit authorizing installation of the well, <br />and the appropriation and discharge of ground water for the system. <br />The well has already been installed, all necessary permits having been <br />obtained in advance. <br />Orono, of all municipalities, should understand the limitation on the <br />scope of its power in light of its experience in Welsh v. City of <br />Orono, 355 N.W.2d 117(Minn. 1984). In the present case, as in that <br />one, the DNR has exclusive control, there being neither express nor <br />implied power of the City to regulate the subject matt-er. <br />On this oasis, we object to any further del&y in the C'ity's permitting <br />process. Furthermore, we object to any attempt by t) City to <br />regulate our client's geo-thermal system indirectly t„ )ugh the <br />withholding of a permit for an underground lischarge pi a into Lake <br />Minnetonka. The City cannot do indirectly wnA, it cannot do directly, <br />and that is regulate the installation of a geo-thermal facil'ty. <br />The only issue remaining is the manner of discharge of the >'.er after <br />it has circulated through the geo-thermal system. A request s been <br />made to the City to allow construction of a pipe within theJ foot <br />set back from Lake Minnetonka to carry the discharge water into Lake <br />Minnetonka. This pipe is similar to the drain pipe which has been <br />installed to direct water away `rom the foundation of the principle <br />residence. <br />2. The only issues before the City are the issuance of a use permit <br />and variance for the installation of a pipe across the 75 foot set <br />back area from Lake Minnetonka. <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 of Orono's zoning ordinance requires a <br />use permit to excavate within the 0-75 foot lakeshore protected area. <br />Subdivision 8 specifically forbids any excavations or structures <br />within that. distance without a variance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.