My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4126
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4100 - 4199 (June 22, 1998 - November 23, 1998)
>
Resolution 4126
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 2:01:51 PM
Creation date
11/17/2015 2:01:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r ' � �4� , <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> b. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � F <br /> '� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . �L`�kE Kog'�� No. 4 �. 2 6 `�� . � <br /> s . .. . <br /> . The Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed this application <br /> on February 17, 1998 and again on Mazch 17, 1998 and May 18, 1998. Members of <br /> the public commented on the proposed duplex use during the public hearing process <br /> and their comments and a submitted petition opposing the duplex use are on � <br /> file. On May 18, 1998 Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of <br /> the requested conditional use pernut for duplex use based upon the following <br /> . fmdings: <br /> a. The criteria established by ordinance for a duplex use are complied with. <br /> b. The property comprising the Maxwell Landing subdivision is of a size that <br /> would have allowed a 3 unit development density if developed as a PRD, <br /> hence the proposed single family use of Lot 1 and duplex use of Lot 2 are not <br /> � inconsistent with the development density that would have otherwise been <br /> allowed via a PRD which is allowed in the LR-1C-1 district. <br /> � �. c.� The east line of Lot 2 should be established as its front lot line. � � <br /> d. Lot 2 does not abut the lakeshore,does not qualify for lake access under City <br /> code standards, and should be prohibited by covenant from gaining lake <br /> access via easement over Lot 1. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the fmdings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance and conditional use pernut <br /> on the health, safety and welfare of the community. ' <br /> 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to . <br /> � . it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> a conditional use permit for the proposed duplex use would not adversely affect <br /> tr�c conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> properties, nor would it depreciate surrounding property values; and that the <br /> . � . proposed level of use of the property would be in keeping with the spirit and intent <br /> of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> • . Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.