Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 24, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />*4. 09-3417 STEPHEN & SUSAN MOSELEY, 1635 BOHNS POINT ROAD -VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5860 <br />Bremer moved, Franchot seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5860, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279 and 78-1288, for the property located at <br />1635 Bohns Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />09-3421 JAMES AND JACQUELINE NEVE, 4060 DAHL ROAD -SETBACK <br />VARIANc:ti:;--______________ _ <br />Bremer moved anchot seconded, to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving a side setback <br />variance for e property located at 4060 Dahl Road. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />6. -3427 AL SERAN, 4099 HIGHWOOD ROA:O -VARIANCE RENEWAL <br />Mr. d Mrs. Al Seran, Applicants, were present. <br />Council <br />Exhibit J <br />urtis stated the applicants have requested that the City Council wai e public hearing at the Planning <br />Commission level. Hardcover _yariances and side setback vari es were granted last June and e~jre.d_ <br />this past June. They were unaware that the variances ha pired. The applicants h~ve requested that the <br />City Council hold the/public hearing at the next Ci ouncil meeting. <br />Al Seran state e was surprised when ent to get his buildingp~rmit that the variance a expired <br />and that ad thought the approv as good for two years:-Seran stated he would · e to get started on <br />~ect as soon as possible ore wintertime,Jmtfhat if he has to reappea ore the Planning <br />ommission and then the · Council, it would cause him to miss his 3line. Seran noted he also has <br />some medical conditi and that he would like to have this t are of as soon as possible. <br />He <br />Murp required by the City Council tonighflst~ approve moving this fo ard to <br />the next City Council eting and to waive the pub · hearing at the Planning Commissi evel. <br />Murphy asked w er anything has change 1th the applicant's plans. <br />Seran state when the City ori · a ly approved his neighbor's a <br />propert); which was nev mstalled. <br />Mrs. Seran no~d the City Engineer ha ed that the concept ofro~ting the roa <br />property line is workable. It a rs that the adjacent property does not h e swale that was part of its <br />approved grading plan. ere was an j::inch-and a 4-inch drain tile JR<le!:Jh~These d ·n tiles <br />have been plugge r removed s -the applicant's property recei . ..altofthe road drainage. S ff is trying <br />to determine e status o( arain tile. <br />Mr. Ser at drain tile was never installed. <br />PAGE 6 oflO