Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 10, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. #09-3417 STEPHEN AND SUSAN MOSELEY, 1635 BOHNS POINT ROAD, Conti,iued) <br />Moseley indicated they did e-mail all the documents they have provided to the City to the neighbor also <br />for his review. <br />Murphy stated the City unfortunately has had problems with issues being encountered with existing <br />foundations once work has commenced and that he would prefer to see the revised plans prior to <br />approving the resolution. <br />White requested the applicants consider utilizing neutral based colors for the home given the close <br />proximity to the lake. <br />Moseley stated they did request that their architect design an addition that would update their property <br />and fit in with the rest of the neighborhood but be minimally intrusive. <br />McMillan stated this normally would be an opportunity to get a structure out of the 0-75 foot zone but <br />that it is a hardship to relocate the house given the trees and other issues with the lot. McMillan noted <br />this house has been grandfathered in. <br />Bremer moved, Murphy seconded, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution granting average <br />lakeshore setback and lakeshore setback variances to construct additions and add a half-story to <br />the existing house, and to grant hardcover variances, for the property located at 1635 Bohns Point <br />Road, subject to review and approval of the revised plans by Staff and the City Engineer. VOTE: <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />#09-3418 DENNIS BATTY ON BEHALF OF BROOK INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, <br />425 SHORELINE DRIVE -COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN /)'- <br />rook Investment Group, and Irfan Habib, Property Owner, was present./ <br />Curtis noted this app 1 tion appeared before the Planning Commission at its July me -t5:ng. The applicant <br />is requesting approval oft ·r proposal to enlarge the existing commercial build: · with additions to each <br />end. The request includes seve <br />/ <br />The applicant is requesting the followin ariances: / <br />1. Building setback. A setback of 29 feet from Ke~;t(:enue right-of-way is proposed for the east <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />addition when the required setback is 35 fe~etback of O feet from the west property line is <br />proposed for the upper level of the we7cl'ftion ~n the required setback is 35 feet. <br />Parking Spaces. The plan h.as ab9µt'80 percent of the ~,spaces required by code. The plan <br />is short 32 spaces. / "' <br />/' ~1,-,t, Parking lot setbacks/etback variances are requested for both parkin0 ~expansions. <br />Structure setb¢, The upper trash enclosure is proposed to have a 3.5 foots back from Kelly <br />Avenue w~en'a 20-foot setback is required. The lower trash enclosure is propos to have a 0 <br />foo~~}ba:'ck from the west property line when a 5-foot setback is required. Both are -~d to <br />_,,, <br />PAGE4