My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1625 Bohns Point Road - 17-117-23-11-0003
>
Land Use
>
04-3042, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 1:28:56 PM
Creation date
2/26/2026 1:12:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 18, 2004 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#04-3042 Pillar Homes, Continued) <br />Shem1ack stated he did not apply for a conditional use pem1it for the excess fill because he was <br />unaware of the City's requirement. Shermack indicated he is now appearing before the Planning <br />Commission to request a grading permit based on the excess fill that was utilized on this site. <br />Shermack stated he would also like to address the City Engineer's comments. First, prior to the <br />landscaping plan being submitted to Staff, at least two site visits were had with members of Staff who <br />advised the landscape architect on what steps should be taken. Shem1ack pointed out there is a two- <br />foot trench with drain tile and rock on top. Shem1ack stated the surveyor was not instructed to dig <br />down to the drain tile and so the elevations depicted on the survey reflect the top of the stone placed in <br />the swale along the pool. Shennack stated they attempted to be very pro-active in their approach to <br />address the drainage on this property and met with staff a number of times to discuss issues relating to <br />drainage. <br />Leslie inquired where the drain tile discharges. <br />Tupper stated the drain tile discharges at about the 93 8', 93 7' contour to the west. <br />Rahn inquired whether there were any public comments regarding this application. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Tupper stated the construction of the swale begins at the 941' elevation at the block retaining wall, <br />which is in the northeast comer. Tupper stated the 941' is the high point, with the swale being <br />constructed five feet from the center point of the swale to the property line and with the swale being <br />sloped towards the lake. In addition, a trench was dug about two feet wide and two feet deep with <br />drain tile on the bottom, which was then filled with rock to the top of the trench. Tupper stated the <br />rock on top is more of a cosmetic feature to make the swale appear like a creek bed. Tupper stated it is <br />their understanding some of the elevations were shot on top of the rock instead of where the soil line <br />was. <br />Leslie inquired whether there is also drain tile in the eastern portion of the swale as it approaches the <br />pond. <br />Shem1ack stated there is not. <br />Rahn inquired whether the home was constructed at the elevation approved. <br />Shermack stated the home was constructed at the proper elevation. <br />Jurgens inquired what the building permit specified for the elevation. Jurgens stated he would like to <br />see a copy of the building permit. Jurgens noted the top of foundation was proposed at 943 .8'. <br />Jurgens inquired what type of joist was utilized. <br />PAGE9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.