Laserfiche WebLink
1vIINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CONilv.ITSSION <br />:MEETING HELD ON MARCH 16, 1998 <br />(#10) #2348 Mary Jane Hauser -Continued) <br />Bressler reviewed the issues #1-8 as noted in the memorandum. Bressler noted that the <br />proposed driveway takes advantage of the existing grades. The alternative suggestion <br />would result in extensive grading. Bressler said Staff recommended denial of the variance <br />as the driveway and deck could be reconfigured to meet the requirements. <br />Attorney Bruce Malkerson, representing the Hauser's, provided additional information to <br />the Commission. He felt the hardcover ordinance data does not support the requirement. <br />He said the revised plan is typical of homes found in this area of the lake and Orono. <br />Malkerson referenced the existing asphalt driveway and the sharp rise to the treed area. If <br />the driveway was placed elsewhere to reduce the amount of hardcover, Malkerson said it <br />would result in cutting through the treed area and causing headlights from vehicles shining <br />into the neighboring homes. While acknowledging that the plan is new construction, <br />Malkerson said the existing lot with landscaping and grades reflect where the best location <br />is for the home and driveway. <br />Bressler informed the Commission that Staff is not advocating for the new driveway but <br />believe the existing driveway could be altered to reduce hardcover. <br />Berg informed Malkerson that the proposal is for new construction. Malkerson responded <br />that the proposed house size is normal for this area. Smith asked Malkerson if it is the <br />applicant's preference to maintain the plan for the residence as proposed and place the <br />drivewav in the treed area to reduce the amount of hardcover bv 4%. Malkerson said that <br />is the applicant's intent given the size of their family. <br />Malkerson reviewed the hardcover allowance according to State law and felt it was not <br />binding upon the City. Malkerson referenced the lot configuration in speaking about the <br />applicant's hardship in substantiating the plan noting the lot was twice as wide as long. <br />Malkerson also noted that the surface runoff goes into the lake untreated, and while it was <br />the City's responsibility to treat the runoff, his client was willing to treat the runoff on his <br />property via the pond. Malkerson said the intent of the hardcover regulations was to <br />enable the cities to liberally grant variances, and cities have changed that intent. He felt <br />the intent of proving hardship was not that there was no other use for the property but to <br />give cities flexibility in granting variances. Malkerson felt the limited excess of hardcover <br />over the standard is reasonable and meets the requirements of allowing the variance. <br />Mr. Hauser said the plan has been revised many times with keeping in mind the 14' drop in <br />grade. He felt any other location for the driveway would be unsatisfactory. Hauser felt <br />the house has been scaled back as much as possible. Hauser said his neighbors support his <br />plan. <br />21