Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCil, <br />iVlli..t.llJ'H..T ..tl.tLJJ Ul'I lVIAKLtl ,l,j. l~~lS <br />(#18) #2351 LAURA ZAUNER, 3262 NORTH SHORE DRIVE -AFTER-THE- <br />FAC'T VAlHANrFS-RFSO"LTTTTON NO. 40:;7 <br />The applicant was present. <br />Bressler reported that the applicant is requesting an after-the-fact variances for hardcover <br />in the 0-75' iakeshore setback, iakeshore setback, and average lakeshore setback to aliow <br />the retention of a rebuilt deck on the lake side of the residence. The Planning <br />Commission recommended approval. Bressler reviewed the findings. <br />Jabbour was informed by the applicant that she gradually rebuilt the deck and apologized <br />for the misunderstanding. Zauner said she did reduce the size of the deck by removal of <br />posts and eliminating planters. Zauner said her hardship was her being transferred to <br />another state and the house is under contract. <br />Jabbour noted that the property is substandard and there is no additional land to <br />purchase. The residence was built prior to zoning and to utilize the residence, a variance <br />is necessary. Nothing would exist on the lot without a variance. <br />Goetten asked that the resolution include the condition that no more hardcover would be <br />allowed on the property in the future. <br />Flint moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4057 with the added <br />condition that no more hardcover be allowed on the property. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Jabbour asked Van Zomeren to include in resolutions boilerplate language stipulating that <br />no additional hardcover would be allowed on these smaller lots. <br />(#19) PARK DEDICATION Al\!IENDl\!IENT-ZONING/SUBDIVISION <br />ORDINANCE <br />Gaffi-on reported that the amendment to the ordinance addresses the issue of rough <br />proportionality, providing a basis for determining the amount of park fees in relation to <br />the impact of both residential and commercial subdivisions on the City's parks. The <br />ordinance establishes that there will be maximum and minimum "per dwelling II park fees <br />established each year. Language has been added regarding how park funds can be used. <br />Other language has been eliminated regarding minimum contributions per lot. The <br />ordinance does not establish park dedication requirements for the development of <br />properties absent a subdivision/PRD/PUD process. Additional discussion is required on <br />this topic. <br />Goetten asked where there is a problem with that issue. Barrett said the City has no <br />authority to take park dedication in the absence of a subdivision. Goetten asked about <br />development noting the impact of such development as Spring Hill Golf Course on parks <br />and rough proportionality. <br />24