Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor and City Council <br />March 20, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br />informal test should not apply since this is a lot which had been developed years ago for a house. <br />The house has been removed, but much of the previously "developed" lot remains, which my <br />clients wish to preserve such as: <br />1. The trees along the existing driveway and the front of the lot. <br />2. The location of the existing power pole. <br />3. The existing paved driveway, the use of which does not result in car lights shining <br />into the home across the street. <br />4. The existing house pad. <br />5. The existing terrain between the house pad and the street. <br />Therefore, we believe that this is not totally "new construction." The development pattern and <br />restrictions for this lot were established years ago by the above factors. <br />In response to the Planning Commission's recommendation, my clients have redrafted the <br />plans further to comply with the recommended 25 .9 percent variance. <br />We respectfully request approval of that recommended variance. <br />cc: Tom Barrett, City Attorney <br />Mr. and Mrs. Hauser <br />15264BDM <br />Very truly yours, <br />Bruce D. Malkerson