My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1410 Bohns Point Road
>
Land Use
>
80-#546, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 11:03:58 AM
Creation date
2/26/2026 10:58:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Beckers in championing*, line A -A as the required setback <br />line are basins.; this on the line of sight from the Lauer house <br />ana thus are impliedly approving, the sight line interpretation. <br />An arithmatical average setback based on the Decker -Lauer set- <br />backswould be half the total of the Becker setback of 115 feet <br />and the Lauer setback of 160 feet, or 137.5 feet. Using this 137.5 <br />feet figure would place the setback on a line which is about 20 <br />f-0. inshore from line A -A on Hhode's north house setback line <br />and 8 feet lakeward from line A -A on Rhode's south house setback <br />line. <br />In Cuvr•y v. Young, (1969) 285 Minn. 387, 173 N.W.(2) 410, our <br />Supreme Court said that a "definite setback" (-,F.n be required "so that <br />the appearance will be uniform." If that fs the purpose of this <br />ordinance, then reasonable uniformity, not an exact mathematical <br />uniformity, seems logically to be all that can be required. Rea- <br />sonable uniformity is achieved by the setback ordered by the council <br />since it achieves some tapering; of the southerly side of the Rhode ✓ <br />house between a line drawn froti, the southerly 1'ront of the Becker's <br />house to the southerly front of the Lauer's house. The initial <br />departure from uniformity was achieved by the Beckers locating <br />their house so much closer to the lake than the Lauers, so the <br />Beckers are not in a sound -al position when they object to <br />.another house being about se to the lake as theirs. <br />If the Lauer house we; ) 115 feet from the shoreline, <br />obviously the Beckers could ha no pos.lble objection to the <br />approved Rhode setback. It 's only the. Becker induced fortuity <br />of the long and shorter setback:: of the Lauer and Becker houses <br />which gives the beckevs any basis .'or an art umettt that the approved <br />setback is improper. Under established princIples the berckers <br />have no leg•;al :standing; to chaI1n1'(. i1q)..:v(.d house <br />location beca+r;;e• of, the farther setback )f th- hou:;e. <br />Thus, in "c}iuW.: V. Kl .,-Al, (11.139), �'u�� �;.ir►n. `.:��� �b4 N.W. 7h'� <br />the court said ;it '06: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.