My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1410 Bohns Point Road
>
Land Use
>
80-#546, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 11:03:58 AM
Creation date
2/26/2026 10:58:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />JABON C. BECKER <br />2700 WHITE OAK CIRCLE <br />LONG LAKE. MINNEBOTA 55355 <br />July 28, 1980 <br />Mr. Alan P. Olson <br />Village Planner <br />City of Orono <br />P. 0. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Dear Mr. Olson: <br />rfl 0 �ft,�IFgTT <br />U11 <br />Jul so <br />CITY. OF: ORONO <br />Thank you for taking the time and trouble to acknow- <br />ledge my letter of July 8, 1980. <br />It would be very helpful if you could answer the <br />following questions for me: <br />1) Was my letter of July 8, 1980, shown to the <br />Planning Commission and the City Council? <br />2) Did Mr. Warren Malkerson review my letter of <br />July 8, 1980? <br />3) As you know, there were a number of factors <br />influencing the Council's decision to specify <br />a location for Mr. Rhode's proposed house. <br />Such t,ings as location of other homes (Lauer's <br />and Becker's), the width of the lot, the total <br />area of the lot, the location of the carriage <br />house, and the location of the easements were <br />all factors influencing the decision of the <br />Planning Commission and ultimately the City <br />Council in Resolution #851. My question is: <br />How can the Planning Commission and Council <br />review only Mr. Rhode's reauest of changing <br />the house location without reviewing ali of <br />the relevant factorss meni oned in the previous <br />sentence? <br />4) Since Resolution 0851 states that the variance <br />will be denied and will be considered invalid <br />unless the conditions of the Resolution are <br />met, why isn't the variance he',g denied, as <br />stated in Resolution 0851? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.