My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1410 Bohns Point Road
>
Land Use
>
80-#546, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 11:03:58 AM
Creation date
2/26/2026 10:58:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Wm. Brad Van Nest July 8, 1980 <br />Page 9 <br />A survey dated 9-3-74--a week before I took <br />title -to 3145 North Shore Drive --shows Fred <br />Rogers moved the easements from 3145 North <br />Shore Drive to 1410 Bohns Point Road. He <br />could not have done this if he did not <br />control both properties. <br />d. Paragraphs 24(b) and (e) state that building <br />a house on 1410 Bohns Point Road won't create <br />overcrowding or materially increased density <br />or materially increased traffic. The facts <br />are that (1) there is already too much noise <br />and traffic in the area resulting from three <br />easements running on either side of 3145 <br />North Shore Drive, (2) there would be at <br />least five boats on the two adjacent lots <br />plus canoes and miscellaneous small craft, <br />(3) any of the three easement holders, in- <br />cluding the one given by Duane Hoff before <br />he moved, can and do invite other families <br />to use the beach and docks, and (4) the City <br />of Orono has absolutely way to enforce <br />covenants which purport to limit (illegally) <br />the use of these three easements. <br />e. Paragraph 28D(1) states the easements are <br />"invalid" (as stated by Mr. Rhode's counsel <br />to counter Mr. Malkerson's objection to <br />granting a variance to a lot with easements) <br />since this would make the lot a subdivided <br />one. Having been "subdivided" the lot would <br />no longer be a legal building lot. Mr. <br />Malkerson's acceptance of Mr. Swenson's <br />characterization of the easements as "invalid" <br />rescued him from facing up to the subdivision <br />and out lot problems. that Mr. Malkerson <br />would state that these easements (and ;. �- <br />sumably all lake easements) are illegal <br />subdivisions and the casements t mselves <br />sf''nvaITiT 'is a gross bending of fact since, <br />as the courts have verified, the easements <br />are valid. 'There is nothing in the Orono <br />Code, Mr. Malkerson's comments notwith,;tand- <br />ing, to even sugges* that the easements are <br />invalid. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.